Indiana lawmakers are weighing two proposals that would reshape how the state manages its natural resources, prompting debate among conservation groups and state officials.

One House bill would eliminate the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, which plays a role in dedicating nature preserves, setting camping fees, and guiding the interpretation of natural resource laws. The Indiana Department of Natural Resources has said it is neutral on the proposal, while the administration argues the commission is no longer necessary because the agency now employs its own experts to develop recommendations.

Opponents of the bill say the commission provides an important avenue for public input. More than half of its members are private citizens, many of whom regularly hunt, fish, or use Indiana’s state parks and trails.

Lawmakers are also considering a separate measure that would establish preservation standards for state-owned forests. The proposal would require forests to maintain a balance of old-growth and new-growth areas. Some environmental advocates question whether fixed percentages are supported by scientific data and warn the approach could limit flexibility in forest management or lead to increased logging.

The forest proposal would also create recreational fees for state forest users. Supporters say the fees would help address funding shortfalls for the state’s Division of Forestry, while critics remain concerned about the broader impact on conservation and public access.